Daubert Standard Scientific Evidence Admissibility

Definition: The standard for admitting expert scientific testimony requiring the trial judge to act as a gatekeeper, evaluating whether the expert's methodology is reliable, based on sufficient facts, and properly applied to the case. Florida adopted Daubert in 2013.

Return to Glossary

Barnes Walker legal reference book
#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Daubert Standard Scientific Evidence Admissibility Information

Daubert factors: the theory or technique can be: tested (falsifiable), the theory or technique has been: subjected to peer review and publication, the known or potential rate of error, the existence of standards controlling the technique's operation, and the general acceptance of the theory or technique in the relevant scientific community. The judge's role: the judge acts as a gatekeeper (the judge must: evaluate the reliability of the expert's methodology before the expert may testify). Distinguished from Frye: the Frye standard required: general acceptance in the scientific community (a single factor), while Daubert uses: a multi-factor reliability analysis (a more flexible approach).

Florida Legal Definition

The Daubert standard in Florida is codified at Florida Statutes §90.702 (Testimony by Experts). Under §90.702 (as amended in 2013): a witness qualified as an expert may testify if: the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data, the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts. Under Florida case law (In re Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, 2018): the Florida Supreme Court initially rejected Daubert but subsequently accepted it. Under Florida practice: Daubert motions are: filed before trial to: exclude unreliable expert testimony.

How It's Used in Practice

Attorneys manage Daubert challenges. For proponents: select well-qualified experts, ensure the expert's methodology is: reliable, tested, and peer-reviewed, prepare the expert for a Daubert hearing, and present the expert's qualifications and methodology to the court. For opponents: file a Daubert motion to exclude (challenging the expert's methodology, qualifications, or application), cross-examine the expert at the Daubert hearing, present contrary expert testimony, and preserve the issue for appeal. The attorney advises: Daubert requires the court to evaluate: the reliability of the expert's methodology; prepare the expert thoroughly; the Daubert motion is a critical pre-trial tool.

Key Takeaways

Business Attorneys
Real Estate Attorneys
Litigation Attorneys
Estate Planning Attorneys
Business Sale Closings
How to Sell a Business in Florida

Reviewed by the attorneys at Barnes Walker, Goethe, Shea & Robinson, PLLC

Disclaimer: The information and opinions provided are for general educational, informational or entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. Any information that you read does not create an attorney-client relationship with Barnes Walker, Goethe, Shea & Robinson, PLLC, or any of its attorneys. Because laws, regulations, and court interpretations may change over time, the definitions and explanations provided here may not reflect the most current legal standards. The application of law varies depending on your particular facts and jurisdiction. For advice regarding your specific situation, please contact one of our Florida attorneys for personalized guidance.

Trust • Experience • Results

Ready to Get Started?

Contact our team for a consultation. We'll guide you through the process.

Legal Inquiry Title Inquiry