Pleading in the Alternative in Florida
Alternative pleading (Rule 1.110(g)) allows inconsistent claims/defenses in one pleading. Example: breach of contract AND unjust enrichment. Preserves all theories when facts/law are uncertain. Each claim must be legally sufficient. Must eventually elect a theory (usually pretrial). Frivolous claims: Section 57.105 sanctions.
What It Means
- Assert inconsistent claims simultaneously
- Rule 1.110(g) specifically permits
Why Used
- Facts uncertain at pleading stage
- Law may be uncertain
- Preserves all potential theories
Limits
- Each claim must be legally sufficient
- Good faith required
- Election of remedies before trial
Related Terms
- Pleading — Court documents
Barnes Walker Litigation
Barnes Walker’s attorneys use alternative pleading strategies in Florida. Request a legal inquiry for assistance.
Reviewed by the attorneys at Barnes Walker, Goethe, Shea & Robinson, PLLC