Undue Influence Will Contest Probate Information
Elements: susceptibility (the testator was: elderly, ill, dependent, or vulnerable to influence), opportunity (the influencer had access to and opportunity to influence the testator), disposition (the influencer had a motive to exercise undue influence: financial gain, power, or control), and activity (the influencer actively procured the will: hiring the attorney, being present during will preparation, or isolating the testator from other family members). Presumption of undue influence: arises when: a beneficiary had a confidential relationship with the testator, the beneficiary was active in procuring the will, and the will benefits the beneficiary substantially. When the presumption arises: the burden shifts to the beneficiary to prove the will was not the product of undue influence.
Florida Legal Definition
Undue influence in Florida is governed by Florida Statutes §732.5165 (Burden of Proof in Contests). Under §732.5165: the burden of proof in a will contest for undue influence is: a preponderance of the evidence. Under Florida case law (In re Estate of Carpenter): a presumption of undue influence arises when: a substantial beneficiary had a confidential relationship with the testator and was active in procuring the will. Under Florida practice: the presumption shifts the burden to the proponent of the will (the proponent must prove the will was not the product of undue influence). Under Florida practice: evidence of undue influence includes: the testator's isolation from family, the beneficiary's control over the testator's finances, and a sudden change in the testator's estate plan.
How It's Used in Practice
Attorneys manage undue influence contests. For contestants: establish the presumption (confidential relationship + active procurement + substantial benefit), present evidence of the influencer's activity (isolation, control, and manipulation), demonstrate the testator's vulnerability (age, illness, and dependence), and argue the will does not reflect the testator's true wishes. For proponents: rebut the presumption (the testator acted independently), present evidence of the testator's intent (prior consistent statements, independent legal advice, and capacity), demonstrate the reasonableness of the disposition (the will reflects the testator's known wishes), and present testimony from the drafting attorney. The attorney advises: the presumption of undue influence is powerful; proponents must present strong evidence of the testator's independent decision-making.
Key Takeaways
- Undue influence: improper pressure overcoming testator's free will.
- §732.5165: burden of proof is preponderance.
- Presumption: confidential relationship + active procurement + substantial benefit.
- Presumption shifts burden to will proponent.
- Evidence: isolation, control, sudden changes, and vulnerability.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions provided are for general educational, informational or entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. Any information that you read does not create an attorney–client relationship with Barnes Walker, Goethe, Perron, Shea & Johnson, PLLC, or any of its attorneys. Because laws, regulations, and court interpretations may change over time, the definitions and explanations provided here may not reflect the most current legal standards. The application of law varies depending on your particular facts and jurisdiction. For advice regarding your specific situation, please contact one of our Florida attorneys for personalized guidance.
Business Attorneys
Real Estate Attorneys
Litigation Attorneys
Estate Planning Attorneys
Business Sale Closings
How to Sell a Business in Florida
Contact Information:
Tel: 941-867-7818
Email: info@barneswalker.com
Trust • Experience • Results