While the House's senior bill (HJR 205) proposes a broad exemption for all seniors regardless of wealth, the Senate version takes a more conservative, "means-tested" approach. Sponsored by a Democrat, this proposal aims to help vulnerable seniors who are truly at risk of losing their homes, rather than providing tax breaks to wealthy retirees.
The Sponsor: Senator Mack Bernard
- Name: Senator Mack Bernard (Democrat)
- District: Senate District 24
- Region: Palm Beach County (covering diverse communities including West Palm Beach and Riviera Beach).
- Background: Senator Bernard is a former County Commissioner and attorney. His legislative focus often centers on housing affordability and protecting residents from gentrification and displacement.
- Political Stance: Bernard's proposal reflects a "needs-based" philosophy. He argues that tax relief should be surgical, targeted at seniors on fixed or working incomes who have lived in their homes for years, rather than a blanket giveaway to every person over 65.
The Proposal: What is SJR 270?
Official Title: Homestead Property Exemption for Persons Age 65 or Older
The Core Mechanism: SJR 270 proposes a constitutional amendment to exempt homestead property from non-school ad valorem taxes for seniors, but with two strict eligibility hurdles that are not found in the House version.
To qualify, you must meet all of the following criteria:
- Age: You must be 65 years of age or older.
- Tenure: You must have owned and maintained the property as your permanent residence for at least 5 years. (This prevents new arrivals from immediately claiming the benefit).
- Income Cap ($350,000): Your household income must not exceed $350,000 (adjusted annually for inflation).
Note: This is a massive expansion compared to the current "low-income" senior exemption, which is capped at roughly $36,000. Under SJR 270, nearly all senior households except the very wealthy would qualify.
Effective Date: If passed and approved by voters, this would likely take effect January 1, 2027.
How Does It Compare to HJR 205?
This is the critical comparison for voters.
The "Law Enforcement Protection" Clause
Interestingly, unlike Senator Bernard's other bill (SJR 274) which omits this language, SJR 270 currently matches the House's stance on police funding.
- The Clause: The resolution proposes prohibiting counties and municipalities from reducing total funding for law enforcement below current levels.
- The Consequence: Even though the revenue loss from this bill is smaller than the House version (because fewer seniors qualify), the "Police Protection" mandate remains. This ensures that any budget shortfalls caused by the exemption cannot be solved by cutting the police budget, forcing cuts to libraries, parks, and public works instead.
Key Takeaways for Voters
- A Safety Net, Not a Giveaway: This proposal is designed to protect the middle class. By capping the income at $350,000, it ensures that tax relief goes to those who feel the sting of inflation, rather than subsidizing wealthy retirees in luxury coastal estates.
- Less Risk to Local Services: Because it excludes the top tier of wealthy seniors, this proposal would drain less money from local budgets than the "unlimited" HJR 205.
- The "Wait Period": The 5-year residency requirement is a key check against "benefit tourism." It ensures that people don't move to Florida solely to take advantage of the tax break immediately; they have to contribute to the system for five years first.
Legislative Status (Current)
- Filed: October 23, 2025
- Committees: Referred to Finance and Tax, Appropriations, and Rules.
- Latest Action: As of November 17, 2025, the bill was officially referred to its three committees and is awaiting its first hearing.
Sources & Further Reading
Navigating Florida's Changing Real Estate market
We hope this guide has provided clarity on the complex property tax proposals facing Florida voters in 2026.
We compiled this research because we believe informed homeowners make better decisions. As a firm dedicated to Florida Real Estate Law and Title Closings, our job is to provide stability and ensure your investment is protected, regardless of how the laws evolve.
For specific questions regarding your upcoming property closing or title needs, our doors are always open.
Legal Disclaimer: The information and opinions provided are for general educational, informational or entertainment purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. Any information that you read does not create an attorney-client relationship with Barnes Walker, Goethe, Perron, Shea & Johnson, PLLC, or any of its attorneys. Because laws, regulations, and court interpretations may change over time, the definitions and explanations provided here may not reflect the most current legal standards. The application of law varies depending on your particular facts and jurisdiction. For advice regarding your specific situation, please contact one of our Florida attorneys for personalized guidance.